The Good Men Project

"It's about time we saw the release of a book like this."

Stuff Magazine

May 20, 2010

A Dynasty of Good Men

Filed under: Good Men — Tags: , , , , — tmatlack @ 5:45 am

BY TOM MATLACK

James and I hurry across the public garden in Boston with a box full of literature to yet another reading of the book about manhood that we co-edited. “Did you hear about Porter’s Dad?”  James asks me, referring to his classmate and the guy who photographed my wedding eight years prior. “He dropped dead of a massive heart attack last week.”  I’m still in shock as James goes on to tell me how the deceased had been on the Andre Doria in 1956 when it was sunk by a collision with the Stockholm, had been navigator on America’s Cup boat Constellation in 1964, and was one of the men who tackled Serhan Sirhan in the moments after he shot Bobby Kennedy’s at the Ambassador Hotel, among other adventures.

As we climb the steps in front of Hampshire House, the home of both the Cheers bar and our speaking event, James passes along Porter’s words of advice as he faced grieving for his father. “He said if you have issues with your dad just start dealing with them now. You may not finish, but at least you will have started.”

“Houghton!” I shouted above the din of the presses, relieved to be taken out of the mind-numbing routine and hoping for some shipping crisis that would keep me in the warehouse all night.

“James? This is John Reyman up in Corning.” John was a senior executive and a good friend of my father’s. He was also my unofficial mentor, tasked with making sure my career was moving in the right direction. “We think everything is going to be OK, but your dad has just been in an accident and he’s being taken to a hospital in Virginia. We’re sending your mom down on a plane, and we’re going to stop and pick you up in an hour. We just think it would be best if you were all together right now.”

My first reaction was relief: I was exhausted after six days on the midnight shift, and getting out a day early seemed like a gift.

James is at the podium reading into a microphone. An elderly lady in the crowd stops him to ask him to speak up. It’s not a huge crowd; 30 or so Beacon Hill lifers. I have already joked that I prefer to read at prisons because I am always guaranteed a big crowd. Besides, the prison audience is pretty interested in figuring out what it means to be a good man, the topic of our book of essays.

An hour later I was standing alone on the tarmac at the local airport, the glare of two street lamps overhead acting as a beacon for the slowly approaching Falcon jet. The engines screamed one final time as the plane rolled to a stop. Mom was silhouetted through one of the porthole windows, waving with false bravado. The door hissed open and the steps unfurled to the ground. Bob Simon, one of the pilots, made his way down the stairs and shook my hand grimly. I muttered my greetings and thanks and launched up the steps into the familiar, beige-and-leather confines of the tube. “Hi, Mom. Is everything going to be OK?”

I’m standing against a mahogany bookshelf watching James as he slumps over to read this turning point in his life. Then I gaze to the back of the room. A meticulously dressed woman sits attentively, and next to her is a man who can only be described as stately in appearance—silver hair, pinstriped suit, white shirt, tasteful tie, and cane tucked off to the side.

My father, Jamie Houghton, was the CEO of Corning Inc., a glass manufacturing company started by his great-great-grandfather, Amory Houghton, in Somerville, Massachusetts, in 1851. In 1868, after a brief stop in Brooklyn, New York, Amory floated his whole operation via the Erie Canal to the banks of the Chemung River and the town of Corning in western New York. From this humble start the company had grown significantly. Corning now had more than 25,000 employees around the world and was known for such consumer brands as CorningWare, Pyrex, and Steuben as well as for the fundamental research that led to such world-changing technologies as the glass lightbulb, the envelope for the cathode-ray tube (which enabled the mass adoption of the television), and fiber optics.

Though the company had gone public in the 1940s, four decades before he became CEO, Dad was the sixth Houghton to run Corning. He had taken over from his brother, who had taken over from their father, who had taken over from his father, and so on.

I seem to have somehow become friendly with a number of men my age whose fathers are titans of industry—owners of sports teams, founders of huge financial institutions, famous architects, and authors. In each case, the shadow cast by a famously successful father put my friends in the no-win position of attempting to measure up to a father of inhuman proportion. In no case was this more true than of James, who had six generations of Houghton men to live up to. For him to find his own way in the world, and for his father to support that choice, seemed on its face very nearly impossible.

The plane landed on the rain-soaked tarmac, and we were soon hurtling through deserted streets to the Norfolk Naval Hospital. Dad had been airlifted to the trauma center after being struck by a car in Williamsburg, Virginia, some forty-five miles away. He had just finished dinner and was crossing the street back to his hotel when a busboy at the end of his shift drove out of the garage at 20 mph and hit him, throwing him into the air. Dad broke several ribs, shattered his right leg, and suffered a severe blow to his head.

Two surgeons met Mom and me as we entered the disorienting green glare of the emergency room. They explained that the situation was stable for the moment but that they needed to operate immediately. They wanted to put a rod in his tibia, screw the rest of the bones back in place, and insert a shunt to drain excess fluid and relieve pressure on his brain. Mom and I stared dumbly, comforted by their curt competence but neither of us daring to ask the obvious question. We merely nodded our consent to their hurried requests to proceed.

We turned to follow a nurse to a waiting room, and there was Dad. He was being ferried on a stretcher, surrounded by trauma personnel and covered by bandages and tubes. “If you want to talk to him, now’s your chance,” one of the surgeons offered. “He is going to be out of it for a while.”

“Hey Dad,” I mumbled weakly, “How are you doing?”

“Hey,” he tried to smile back and reached out his hand. “What are you doing here? I am such an idiot. This is just so stupid. You shouldn’t have come. I am so sorry to drag you into this. How do I look?”

When he saw Mom he let out a stifled cry and grabbed her hand as hard as he could. “I am so sorry,” he said. “I am just so sorry.”

James pauses for a beat and looks up. This is actually the second time I have heard James read this story in the presence of his Dad. The first was an off-Broadway reading we had last fall before a packed house. I was too worried about the whirlwind tour we were in the middle of to take in what was actually happening. But this time, with a more intimate crowd and the luxury of time, I can see it clearly: a father and son who love each other unconditionally despite the weight of legacy.

The haze that followed over the next twenty-four hours included many hushed consultations, with the doctors and with various company executives who began to assemble to help manage the crisis. Dad had come through the first set of surgeries but was still in intensive care and would require several more operations. Despite their gravity and repeated references to “a major trauma,” the surgeons seemed confident that Dad would make it. But it was unclear whether he would suffer any lasting damage. The Corning executives, meanwhile, started planning how to deal with the impact the news could have on the company’s stock price and on the broader Corning community. The company may have been on a roll, but now the CEO was gone, and this would be the first time in many years that a Houghton wasn’t at the helm. I sensed that the looks of concern directed my way were about more than sympathy.

Afterwards, I joke with “Jamie” Houghton that I am glad he made it through the accident and equally glad that in the end James decided to go his own way. Just after leaving Corning, he had become my business partner, a decade ago now. I kiss James’s mom and wife Connie before giving my friend a hug good-bye. Before leaving, Jamie jokes about how James still has trouble speaking up in public. “It’s because he has such a big heart,” I reply.

Tom Matlack is cofounder of The Good Men Project.
The Good Men Project book is for sale
here.



 

May 17, 2010

7 reasons to buy The Good Men Project book

Filed under: Good Men Book — Tags: , , , , , , — tmatlack @ 6:00 am

1) The conversation is important. Thirty-one guys have shared their stories with the world. Stories about war and sex and sexuality and infidelity and redemption and death and marriage. There are stories about men trying to be good fathers and men trying to be good sons. Are they all “good” men? You tell us. This is the conversation we want to have.

2) The reviews are as good as it gets. Ok, don’t believe everything you hear. Forget the hype for a minute. Pay no attention to the fact that out of 57 reviews of The Good Men Project, it’s nearly impossible to find one that’s critical. Maybe, instead, look at the words of a reviewer that validates what we set out to do in the first place: “Each man’s story shed light on my own.”

3) The stories will surprise you. Do you really know what it’s like to be a photojournalist in Iraq, one who thinks he might want to come back to the US, live a normal life, but finds himself inexplicitly drawn back to the foxholes again and again? Have you struggled with being a reluctant stay at home dad, envious of men who go off to work? Have you had a moment with your wife when you stormed out of the house, and in retrospect said, “Truth be told, I was leaving her.” The stories are varied, and rich, and interesting. For example, read Michael Kamber’s story here.

4) How often do you the get the chance to meet and talk to every character in a book?
You can friend Tom Matlack, Jesse Kornluth, Julio Medina on Facebook. Follow Perry Glasser and Andre Tippet on Twitter. Visit Mark St. Amant’s or Rick Federico’s blog. Comment on an interview with Christopher Koehler. Take a yoga class with Rolf Gates. They’re real people. Every one of them. You can talk to them.

5) It sure beats a hammer or a tie. Have you shopped for a Father’s Day gift lately? Not such a bad thing, to let your father know you think he’s a good man.

6) Not surprisingly, girls believe in The Good Men Project, too. Well, sure. Here’s a review from a site for girls: “…with everything from Tiger Woods, to Chris Brown, to the dozens of politicians having affairs, to all the kidnapping stories of young girls, to the kind of men we have experienced in our own lives… sometimes it’s hard for girls to have any kind of faith that there are good boys and men in the world. “The Good Men Project” is finally a group of men stepping up and saying that they want to be people we can believe in.” From THIS review.

7) Proceeds help at-risk boys and men. The Good Men Foundation is a registered New York State 501(c)(3) charitable corporation dedicated to helping organizations that provide educational, social, financial or legal support to men and boys at risk. A part of every sale goes back to the Foundation. What exactly does that mean? It means that when the Foundation gives $50 to The Big Brothers and Big Sisters, they can introduce a boy to a potential Big Brother. It means when the Foundation gives $25 to the Trinity Street Potential, that organization will have funds to buy art supplies for another week. It means that when the Boys and Girls Club gets $100, they can buy a violin for their music class. Money buys tangible things that help at-risk boys. That’s why we donate it.

You can buy The Good Men Project book on the website, here. It’s also on Amazon. Soon to be in stores such as Barnes & Noble. As a Kindle book. And don’t forget the DVD.

 

May 12, 2010

Calling young men bloggers

Filed under: Good Men, Uncategorized — Tags: , — tmatlack @ 7:21 pm

Photo by Beverly & Pack, Flickr

The Good Men Project is looking for some young male writers/columnists who want to write about being, you know, under 25 and stuff. You would need a bit more of a focus than that, but if you’re under 25, can write well, and have a topic or theme or idea that you want to write about once or twice a month for us, email the idea and some samples of your writing to goodmenblogs@gmail.com. Some sample ideas for columns (but please don’t be limited by these): Being gay in HS. Being a young father. Being an athlete. Being a soldier at war.

 

April 20, 2010

Man-to-Man and More with Author BRADY UDALL

Brady Udall likes to say that without polygamy he wouldn’t exist. His great-great-grandfather David King Udall was a polygamist, and David’s second wife, Ida, was Brady’s great-great-grandmother. “It’s part of my heritage,” says Udall. “It’s part of who I am.” It also inspired The Lonely Polygamist, the fictional story of the Richards family—all thirty-three of them—and their patriarch, Golden Richards, who, in the grips of a midlife crisis, strays outside of his three marriages and has an affair that threatens to destroy his family’s future. The novel will be published next month by W.W. Norton & Co.

Udall also wrote the short story collection Letting Loose the Hounds and the novel The Miracle Life of Edgar Mint, an international bestseller. His work has appeared in The Paris Review, Playboy, GQ and Esquire, and his stories and essays have been featured on National Public Radio’s This American Life. He teaches in the MFA program at Boise State University and lives in Boise, Idaho, and Teasdale, Utah, with his one wife and four children.

Good Men Project cofounder Tom Matlack recently spoke with Udall by phone and, in addition to giving him the Project’s Manhood Quiz, Matlack asked Udall about his new book and about his thoughts on polygamy, and he found out who wins when Udall plays his sons in basketball.

Tom Matlack: I’d to start by hearing a little bit about your family and how you came to write a novel focused on polygamy. How did that all happen?

Brady Udall: Growing up, I didn’t know a whole lot about polygamy. I grew up in the house that my great-great-grandfather built. Giant house: 10 bedrooms and seven bathrooms. We all knew that it was a polygamous house, and that we had multiple great-great-grandmothers, or however you want to put it. But it wasn’t talked about a lot. And then I got the chance, in 1998, to write an article for Esquire about polygamy. So I went and did a lot of research for that and met with polygamists, and as I was doing the research, I knew that it was fascinating, and so I knew that I would write a novel about it one day.

TM: So what’s your take on polygamy? How does it feel to be the result of polygamy?

BU: I always felt a little weird about it, and I guess one of the reasons for that is because I expected that polygamists were a bunch of whacked-out weirdoes. You see the stuff on TV, you hear the stuff that they supposedly do, and you automatically jump to the conclusion that they’re cultists or just out of their minds in some way or another. But the people who I met and talked to were normal—just as normal as you or me. And that, to me, was much more interesting than the weirdoes. The way I looked at it was that these were normal people living in a very abnormal way. And so, to me, polygamy is just a very, very American oversized family, a family pushed to its extreme. And that’s fascinating.  When I think about polygamy and when I’ve been writing about polygamy, I think it’s mostly about family. So I’m not terribly interested in why they do it. I’m more interested in how they manage it.

TM: And what did you find in terms of how the women and the men managed this arrangement?

BU: The women who I met seemed happier and more content and even more confident in many ways than the men I met. The men seemed put out. Several of them said they must be crazy to be doing what they were doing. I never heard that from the women. And it made some sense to me. Just to give you one anecdote: The guy I kind of profiled in the Esquire piece, he’s a millionaire. And he has to make well over $1 million: He has four wives and 30 children. He took me into his office and showed me a dental bill for $28,000.I thought it was for the year, but it was for the month of August. He had these bills stacked up on his desk—this is in his office at work, because he doesn’t actually have a house. All the wives have a house, and he just goes among them. He has a little overnight bag, and he goes from house to house like a weird traveling salesman or something. So I could see the pressure on this poor guy and what he had to think about every day and what he had to do. I think we tend to think, oh, the poor women. They have to deal with the jealousy and all of that. And maybe it’s just because I’m a guy, but, man, I felt really sorry for him.

TM: I was thinking about this a little bit and joking about it: If Tiger Woods just married all of the women he has been with it would be no big deal.

BU: Exactly. The polygamists say, “Why is it weird and socially unacceptable for me to marry three women and devote my life to them when Hugh Hefner can have three or four hotties living in his mansion and everybody thinks it’s fine?” I don’t have a good answer for them. I won’t defend polygamy, but I guess I’ll defend somebody’s right to engage in it, as long as they’re not hurting anyone.

TM: It’s interesting, in terms of the history of polygamy in our country, how judgmental we’ve been with it. It’s obviously become this huge third rail.

BU: Especially those of us who might be more liberal-minded, we like the idea of alternative lifestyles and that people should be able to live different kinds of arrangements and so on, but when we run up against polygamy, because it’s so patriarchal and so deeply conventional and conservative—it stretches back thousands of years, you know, to King Solomon with his 700 wives—we don’t like it. We find it loathsome, and yet I don’t think it’s really any different from any other alternative lifestyle or living arrangement.

TM: How has it affected you personally? Has it changed you in any way to meet these people and reclaim the heritage of your family?

BU: I’ve never been embarrassed about where I’ve come from, but now I can say I’m proud of it. My great-great-grandfather did not really want to be a polygamist. He was pretty much ordered to be one by Brigham Young. And he ended up being sent to prison in Detroit for it. So he really suffered for it. And his second wife, my great-great-grandmother, suffered even more. She had to go underground so that she couldn’t be caught and he couldn’t be caught. This wasn’t something they did just because they thought it would be fun or thought it would be interesting.  They did it only because they thought God wanted them to do it. And I have to respect that.

TM: Your new book, The Lonely Polygamist, it’s told from the perspective of the guy who’s struggling to maintain this lifestyle.

BU: Yes, he’s sort of the main character. It’s told from his point of view, and then it’s told from the point of view of one of the wives and one of the children. In the middle of writing it, what seemed pretty clear to me was that if anybody’s getting the shaft in this arrangement, it’s usually the children, especially the boys. There are only a few places in a polygamous community for boys, meaning not every boy can have four wives or six wives. And the boys who don’t end up being the chosen ones know they are going to basically be kicked out of that community, that they’re going to be pushed out. And that’s really tough for a kid at, say, ten or twelve to already know that he has no place in his community.

TM: And is that historically what happened?

BU: Yeah, it happens even now. They’re called lost boys, and they’re the boys who end up being pushed out because there isn’t a place for them, and so they act out. It’s kind of a strange cultural thing that happens. They either act out, or if somebody finds a reason for them not to be there anymore, they’re often pushed out at a young age, in their teens, so they can’t be competition for the wives.  This happens much more in the conservative polygamous communities. It’s not so common in the independent ones, the more liberal ones. I guess I should make it clear that just as there are different kinds of monogamous people, there are many different kinds of polygamists.

TM: How does this selection happen? How do they pick who’s the winner and the loser?

BU: It’s mostly according to who you know and who you’re related to, as it so often is in life. Also, it’s just a kind of fatefulness. If you’re already clearly one who toes the line and says the right things and does the right things, you’ll be rewarded.

TM: That turn of phrase, the lost boys, that’s really interesting to me. In a way, in The Good Men Project, that’s what we’re focused on, and there are lost boys all over this country who are left out in all kinds of ways.  So how do you think this whole thing has changed your view of romantic love?

BU: I’m not sure it’s changed my view that much. We have this myth in our society of the soul mate. And it’s pretty silly.  I think some people find one person who they’re very compatible with.  But most of us don’t.  Most of us have to figure it out and work at it.  And it’s possible to love more than one person at the same time.  We don’t want to believe it for some reason, but it is. So I think it’s just opened my mind a little bit to possibilities beyond the one that we culturally accept at this time. And I think that’s good.

TM: Are you married?

BU: Yeah, I’m married. and I have four kids. I’ve been married for eighteen years, or something like that. I’ve never had thirty kids; I have only four, but it seems like thirty sometimes.

TM: How old are your kids?

BU: They’re fifteen, twelve, eight and six.

TM: Are you a practicing Mormon?

BU: No, I wouldn’t go that far. I’m proud of being a Mormon, but I don’t practice, no. The organized aspect of any religion, the kind of clone aspect of it, I don’t particularly care for.

TM: What do you tell your kids about their heritage, about polygamy?

BU: They ask about it, and we talk to them about it. And since I’ve been working on it for so long, they’ve heard me have conversations with people, and I think it seems pretty normal to them.

TM: Well, let me fire some of these Man-to-Man questions at you. The first one is, who taught you about manhood?

BU: The first person who comes to mind is my grandfather, who I grew up next door to.  He was a farmer, a rancher, and he was a pretty gruff person. But he taught me how to work, which is very important where I come from. He taught me how to wake up early in the morning and work all day long and not complain about it.  And so he really taught me how to be the conventional ideal of a man that existed maybe fifty or sixty years ago. He wasn’t a touchy-feely guy, but he expected a lot from his kids and his grandkids.  And I’m glad I had that experience.

TM: How do you think romantic love has shaped you as a man?

BU: I’m not a terribly romantic person.  My wife would be the first to say that.  But I believe in the importance of expressing your love in very open ways. And so that’s what I’ve tried to do more.  My tendency is to do like so many other men do and hold it in and deflect it.  As time has gone on, I’ve seen how important it is to express it openly.

TM: What two words would you use to describe your dad?

BU: Oh, wow. My dad. My dad is…he’s…wow. I’m trying to come up with the two that best describe him. I would say the two words would be…wow, this is…do people have a hard time with this?

TM: Some people do.  It kind of goes right to the core, you know.  One of my favorite was “drunk and absent.”

BU: See, that’s easy. No, my dad wasn’t either of those.  My dad is sweet and pragmatic.

TM: What did your dad do for a living?

BU: My dad was my high school principal. It sucked.

TM: How do you think you’re most unlike your dad?

BU: I’m not conventional or conservative.  A lot of sons would say that about their fathers.  We all think our fathers are more conventional than we are.

TM: From which mistake did you learn the most?

BU: This is general, but from the mistake of anger.  That’s where I’ve learned the most, I guess.

TM: What word would the women in your life use to describe you, and do you think it’s true?

BU: They might say I’m reticent.  And yeah, it’s true.

TM: Who’s the best dad you know, and what makes him so?

BU: I’m a pretty good dad, but I’m trying to not blow my own horn.

TM: You can say that. What makes you a good dad?

BU: The easy thing is to say my own dad. My father-in-law, who just passed away, was an incredible father in that he managed never to judge his children but still was able to discipline them.  And I never figured out how he was able to pull that off.

TM: Was he a Mormon?

BU: Yeah, he was a Mormon, a very devout Mormon. So he had a very strong ethical and moral core, religious core, and yet he managed to not be judgmental, to not let anybody feel like they’d let him down. And it still amazes me when I think about how he was able to do that.

TM: Yeah, I think that’s the goal.  It’s hard to do.

BU: It is hard to do.  And I’m terrible at it. I do the old disappointed look and shake my head, and it just makes my kids wither.  And then I feel bad about it.

TM: Do you think you’ve been more successful in your public or your private life?

BU: My public life.  And that’s too bad.

TM: Why do you think that is?

BU: It’s easy for a lot of us, I think, to seem like we know what we’re doing in public.  But it’s much harder to do the right things and be the right person when nobody else is watching, especially just the few people who matter most to us.  And so it’s always something I’m trying to be better at, at being more successful in my own home.

TM: When was the last time you cried?

BU: Oh, probably the last time Extreme Makeover: Home Edition came on television. There’s some poor family, and they come into their new house, and it must makes me tear up every damn time.

TM: What advice would you give teenage boys trying to figure out what it means to be a good man?

BU: I would give the very, very old-fashioned advice, which they probably never listen to: Be yourself.  Do not do something because somebody else thinks it’s cool.  Go your own way, and people will respect you for it.

TM: All right, here’s the bonus question: What’s your most cherished guy ritual?

BU: Playing pick-up basketball. I really need the release and the camaraderie of playing basketball with a bunch of guys.

TM: Do you play with your son?

BU: Oh yeah, I do. I have two sons. I’ll play with both of them or one of them at a time. I used to play with my dad, so it means a lot to me.

TM: Can they beat you?

BU: Hell, no. I don’t know about you, but I’m the type of dad who will not let my kids beat me at anything. I trash talk to kids, and they don’t like, and that gets them frustrated. But it’s sort of my way of trying to get them used to the real world.

TM: I think that as a father, you need to teach boys that being sensitive and being soft is OK, but you also need to teach them how to be tough at the right time.

BU: That’s why sports is so important, both for girls and boys. In our culture they don’t have to do a lot of physical stuff, usually, and so being forced to go outside their comfort zone physically is strange and difficult. And I think very often it does fall to the dad to teach them that it’s going to happen to them and they have to be able to confront it at some point.

 

March 8, 2010

The Good Men Project at the Oscars

Filed under: Book tour — Tags: , , — tmatlack @ 6:15 am

The Good Men Project has been in Hollywood before, but never in a private suite at the Luxe Hotel on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills.

The book and DVD were given out to various celebs and VIPS who were there for the pre-Oscar hoopla. Some notable guests that walked through the suite where The Good Men Project was stationed were Quentin Tarantino (Inglorious Bastards), Maggie Gyllenhaal (Crazy Heart), Lee Daniels (director of “Precious”), Stanley Tucci (The Lovely Bones), and Woody Harrelson (The Messenger).

And we heard from our secret agent in the field that quirky actor Crispin Glover (most recently appearing as The Knave of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland) was sitting in the corner of the suite reading The Good Men Project for over twenty minutes.

Many had heard about the book, others were seen reading it during the course of the day. A few folks asked if the film was nominated in the documentary category.

Nice to know that real stories about men have a place in the glitzy world of Beverly Hills.

Information on Hollywood Suite by Josh Mitchell.

 

Subscribe

RSS Feed  RSS    RSS Feed  Email

Join us on the Web