The Good Men Project

"The essays pack unusual power, just plain healthy, straightforward, emotional power."

F.D. Reeve

Author of The Toy Soldier and Other Poems and The Blue Cat Walks the Earth

May 31, 2009

Daily Blog: Dave Matthews

Filed under: Daily Man, Good Men, Work — tmatlack @ 8:10 am

daveimagesJust after my wife and I got married we went to our first DMB show at Great Woods.  The Iraq war had just begun and there were several service men in our section getting ready to ship out.  Dave pointed at them early on in the concert and said,”Be safe.”   I was impressed.  I also found his music (dramatic violin and sax solos mixed with acoustic guitar and compelling poetic lyrics) riveting.  There was also something in his on-stage humility that struck me as unusual.  After each song, Dave has always had the habit of addressing the crowd with a simple, “thank you very much.”

I took my teenage kids and wife for another DMB show last night at Fenway.  We were not disappointed.  Dave was battling a cold.  The absence of his long-time sax player LeRoi Moore, who died in an ATV accident, was noticeable as Dave apparently decided no one person could replace his buddy and selected a new sax player and a sizable trumpet player who doubled on back-up vocals.   But it was a perfect sunny May evening.  My son, who had never been to a concert of any kind, looked on in awe as Dave belted out new and old songs and Boyd Tinsley put his violin through its paces with his bulging biceps, dredlocks flying everywhere.

I listened carefully to Dave’s lyrics, each one a story often of subtle yearning for love and faith (in one instance both with the chorus, “I want to love you Jesus!”) and looked around both confused and pleased that this guy with such rich music and message, a guy who’s whole act is not an act but sincere modesty, inspires such a loyal following from all ages but particularly young people.  And as I watched Dave, and the crowd, just a tiny piece of my cynicism about our country was chipped away.   Dave’s a good man and a stadium of people loved him for it.

 

May 30, 2009

Good Man: Amin Ahmad “Ashoka’s Lion”

Filed under: Coming of Age, Good Men — tmatlack @ 5:02 am

120px-india_1947_ashoka_lions_1_and_half_annas

Ashoka’s lion

As we get ready to travel to India, my fiancee makes fun of the passport I travel on: She says it looks like something made at home. Compared to her sleek American passport with its built-in chip, my Indian passport is like something from another time–a cardboard book with Ashoka’s lion engraved onto the cover. My photograph is pasted-in, and to make things worse,  mistakes have been corrected with White-Out. Due to some stubborn Indian regulation all my previous passports have been attached, too, so the little cardboard books have begun to resemble a small bible, tattered and well thumbed through, like the bibles owned by the crazy people I see on the bus.

And in a way, my old clunky passport is my bible. The first passport goes back to when I was 16. The entire disjointed story of my immigrant life is written into those pages: my student visas to Vassar and MIT, the endless stamps in Arabic from visiting my parents in Dubai, the change in status from “student” to “architect” duly noted. The passports even contain the story of my failed marriage to a hometown Calcutta girl. Her name is noted in the back of my passport as my next of kin, though we’ve been separated and divorced for many years now. I haven’t bothered to update it,  as in a few months I’ll be applying for American citizenship.  Then I’ll exchange these old tattered cardboard books for a sleek blue one with an eagle on the cover. It will be as blank as the blankness of this country, and in it I will write the next chapter of my life.

So my fiancee and I get ready to travel to India, stashing her sleek passport with my old one. I’m returning to India after six years; I havent been back since the divorce. I couldn’t bear to visit the city where I met and courted my first wife, where I was married with 400 people watching me.  But it’s been too long, and my parents are getting old, and its time to go. This is probably the last time I’ll travel on my Indian passport.

The trouble starts in London, where we are stopping over for a few days. We get off the plane and India begins: a queue of Indians that stretches and loops through the cold, battered, third-world looking airport. Even the British immigration officials are mostly immigrants, West Indians with dark skin, Sikhs with turbans, and Muslim women with their heads smartly covered in imperial blue wraps.

My fiancee and I move slowly through the line until it is our turn to stand in front of the immigration official; I think that it’s lucky we’ve chanced upon the Muslim woman–surely she will recognize me as one of her own and wave me into the United Kingdom.

The woman gives my fiancee’s American passport a quick swipe and is finished. When she comes to my passport, she is more circumspect. She fingers its worn cardboard cover before opening it. When she finally does, she dives deep into it, looking at the travel stamps: Oman, Dubai, Malaysia, Indonesia, Russia. The more exotic the stamp in the passport, the slower she goes.

“My most current passport is the one in the front,” I say helpfully, but she doesn’t seem to be listening.

The woman sighs, and my heart sinks. She begins to type, slowly, hopelessly on her computer screen, turned away so I cannot see what she is doing.

“Would you please step this way,” she says. ” We need to do a secondary immigration check on you, ask you some questions.”

The woman gestures to a bench where a few immigrants are sitting: an old Sikh man with a saffron turban, a veiled woman, a Bangladeshi family on the verge of tears, fearfully clutching each other.

I don’t belong there, I want to say to the immigration official. I’m not like them. I live in BOSTON. I graduated from MIT. My work is published.

But all the woman sees is a brown face and a battered Indian passport. There is no arguing with her.

“I’m going to sit with him,” my fiancee says loyally. “We’re engaged, you know.”

The immigration official shrugs. It seems as though it doesn’t make a difference to her what my fiancee does.

We take our place on the hard bench, to one side of the immigration hall. I watch all varieties of white people go through immigration, clearing it in seconds, as though going through a subway turnstile. They saunter into the United Kingdom, and I sit on the bench and watch them.

Hopelessness floods my heart, a sort of racial hopelessness. This is what it boils down to: I am another brown face; my Indianness trumps everything. It is history: The British, who conquered my country and taught me the English that I speak, have always had the power. They can keep me out of their country, as they have been doing for hundreds of years.

I look around me. The old Sikh man is crying silently. He is clearly straight from some village deep in Punjab. He even smells of the village, a mixture of wood smoke and tobacco. The Bangladeshi family huddled together looks familiar in their smallness, like some obscure branch of my Calcutta family. In different cirumstances I could talk to them in Bengali. No doubt we’d find someone we knew in common.

A wave of emotion washes through me. I’ve gone through the panic to calm, to resignation. It feels right somehow: These are my people; I belong with them. I am Indian to the core. I will sit on this bench, and if they don’t let me into the UK, the hell with it.

My fiancee is saying something, but I can’t hear her. I’m lost in my thoughts. Then she tugs at my sleeve.

“The woman is saying we can go through. It’s OK,” my fiancee says.

The immigration official is waving my passport at me. She wants me to collect it.

My fiancee has got up already, smiling confidently, in a happy American fashion. Perhaps the immigration official saw my fiancee sitting with me  and thought, “Oh, he’s travelling with an American. That’s not so bad. I could let him in.”

But I no longer want to go to the UK. Let them have their stupid, cold country. My place is here, with my people. I could sit on this bench for hours.

But of course, I don’t. My fiancee is already walking away, toward the official, toward the United Kingdom.

I get up and follow her. The immigration official gives me my old passport back, stamped with the red seal of the United Kingdom.

When I look back, I see my people sitting hopelessly on the bench. The old Sikh man is looking straight ahead now, deep in resignation.

I turn my back on them. I walk through immigration and into the baggage hall and through customs into the cold, rain-scented English air. I take deep breaths of it, as though I’ve surfaced from some old, deep place.

 

May 29, 2009

Daily Man: Does Being a Dad Rewire a Man’s Brain?

Filed under: Fatherhood — tmatlack @ 5:25 am

1275207391_9dca5845a32

In a darkened nursery, I rocked my 3-month-old son. I was feeding him a bottle for the first time, and as he suckled and slowly fell off to sleep, I inhaled deeply. I can still remember that sweet, fresh scent. As I held him to my chest, his tiny body felt warm and his skin amazingly smooth and soft. I listened to his little lungs fill with air and gradually let go in a sleep song. As I felt this tiny stranger’s heart beat, my own heart slowed with the sensation that everything was going to be okay.

I had been kicked out of the house a few weeks earlier, and this was my first attempt to reach out to the son who I had always wanted but had been too distracted to notice. Feeding him that bottle inspired me to try harder. I often summon the feeling of that night when I find myself in challenging situations, in danger of doing something stupid.

My son is in seventh grade now. I’d like to believe that, though I wasn’t such a swell guy then, I have done a lot of growing up since. But I have always felt that it was my son, and my daughter, who in some sense were responsible for my salvation. They made me a better man.

Now there’s new scientific evidence to support the premise that being a dad can change you–physically, that fatherhood alters a man’s biochemistry in fundamental ways. That’s nice to hear. But whether the change is chemical or spiritual, all I know is that I will forever be grateful that I got to give my son his bottle that night and see what I had been missing.

 

May 28, 2009

Daily Man: What’s a Guy to Do?

Filed under: Coming of Age, Daily Man, Fatherhood, Relationships, Work — tmatlack @ 5:24 am
2873028639_059475d25b

The Boy Scout Memorial

Yesterday’s NYT article “Financial Careers Come at a Cost to Families” By DAVID LEONHARDT, like Michael Lewis’s new book HOME GAME: An Accidental Guide to Fatherhood, is startling, not because of its content (anyone who went to business school, as I did, knows that if you work on Wall Street you will need to check your family at the door), but because it was even published.  Lewis must see some megatrend for sure if he has turned from capitalism and sport to the soft stuff.  The Times, too, is not generally the kind of paper to put puff pieces in its business section, along with coverage of the GM bankruptcy and the continuing investigation into Madoff.  So what gives?

Our basic premise at THE GOOD MEN PROJECT is that, as guys, we are in a prisoner’s delemma of massive proportions.  And it’s only very recently, with the world literally blowing apart, that we have even realized what is going on.  We are the strong silent gender.  We don’t like to talk about this shit.  But at this point we can’t afford not to.  Even Michael Lewis and the NYT have figured that out.  What it comes down to is the desire to provide and be a good “outside” guy while at the same time being a decent husband and good father.  There just are no longer enough hours in the day.  And the expectations of men are in direct contradiction with one another.

My VC partner and partner in GOOD MEN, James Houghton, likes to point out that guys our age (we are both in our mid-40s) generally had mothers who were in some way affected by the women’s rights movement.  So they tried to teach their sons to be sensitive, to be good fathers and husbands by actually showing up, changing diapers, and just being present a lot more than were prior generations of men, who viewed all that as women’s work.  But we also had fathers who were brought up to believe that manhood had more to do with getting stuff done, having a good job, making your mark on the outside world.  James had a very traditional father (the CEO of Corning), while I had a much more liberal dad (a social activist and English professor). But our fathers offered us the same perspective on manhood–one that contradicted the ideas we got from our feminist mothers.

So here we are–finance pros like James and I, GM workers in Detroit, school teachers, cab drivers–guys just trying to sort out what the hell to do: how to make a living, how to be a real man on the outside while living up to what we sense is our responsibility to our families at home.   There are no easy answers, and being a strong silent type sure as hell isn’t going to get it done this time.

 

May 27, 2009

Daily Man: It’s not what we say, its what we don’t say

Filed under: Daily Man, Relationships, Work — tmatlack @ 3:23 am

When I was interviewing my classmate and friend Matt Weiner about his hit show MAD MEN, well before it had become the sensation it is now,  I was struck with one idea he repeated to me over and over again when I asked about his writing process. “It’s not what Don Draper says, it’s what he doesn’t say that’s really important.” That was over a year ago, just after the MAD MEN team had come back from the strike and started working on season two. Matt’s gone on to win all kinds of awards since then, but I have continued to ponder just what he meant and the relevance to all us guys out there.

Weiner himself is a contradiction. He studied feminist poetry at Wesleyan, even moderating a debate between women on the topic of pornography (if you want a laugh you can hear him describe that scene on audio tape, just scroll to bottom and click) . Yet the women on MAD MEN are treated horribly. He argued violently with me that the show is actually feminist because it is holding up a mirror to us all to see what sexism really looks like, then and even now. He is obsessive with his costumes to make them authentic and, he told me in no uncertain terms, he is just as obsessive about showing the truth of how women in that environment were treated. And from the discomfort of watching real-life, the viewer has to deal with how it relates to 2009 and their own lives. “It’s a direct challenge,” he told me.

So where does that leave the guys? Don Draper is a liar, a cheat, a drunk and a womanizer. He doesn’t seem very happy, I have to say. He looks miserable. But he is trapped in his inability to come clean, to actually articulate what the hell is going on. Weiner admitted that his first drafts of the show always come out with no real narrative line on purpose. It’s man’s attempt to run from himself and the truth. It’s Weiner’s wife, his first and most trusted reader, who always tells him, “Matt, this makes no sense. You actually have to give the actors lines that they can deliver with some conviction.” So Weiner redrafts for plot. But he never allows Draper, or the other men, to rescue themselves. They are not capable. The show’s momentum is built on them digging deeper and deeper holes for themselves.

So, I ask, why do we, in 2009, find Draper (and Weiner for that matter, since this is his creation) so riveting? My theory is that we understand all too well what Weiner is talking about when he says it’s not what men say, it’s what they are incapable of saying that really counts. As guys, we have been unable to come clean emotionally for way too long. Women have been left to read the tea leaves. But it’s not them that it has hurt most. It’s us. We are trapped. We don’t want to talk about our “feelings” for fear that we will end up on some Oprah show from hell. Yet if we stick to the box scores and the stock market, our real experience of life will go unnoticed, and what we really care about never is articulated.

I think what Weiner has figured out is that by dressing his characters up in 1960 suits and putting cigarettes in all their fingers he gets us to lower our guard just enough to watch Don Draper, feel compassion for him, and realize that he isn’t just some figment of our imagination. He is actually us.

ddimages1

 

Older Posts »

Subscribe

RSS Feed  RSS    RSS Feed  Email

Join us on the Web