The Good Men Project

"Sincere, ambitious and nearly always engaging, these stories will touch familar chords in men."

The MetroWest Daily News

March 30, 2009

Daily Blog: "Good Men"

Filed under: Coming of Age, Daily Man — tmatlack @ 6:00 am

I think I am coming back around to Good Men: Real Stories of How We Grow Up, Get Over It, and Get on with Our Lives.

Here’s why. I actually think the “Good Men”, by being controversial makes our point. Why should it be so sacrilegious to put those two words together? All the crazy images it brings up for people (cults, drum banging, et al) are a sign that something is wrong. There are good men in this world and we all, for heaven’s sakes, aspire to be one of them. Here are stories of dozens of men, who have struggled mightily, each in their own way, to accomplish just that. Some have succeeded and some have failed miserably. But none for lack of trying.

The other reason is all the branding we have done with Stephen Sheffield’s amazing photos (http://stephensheffield.blogspot.com/). I realized that part of what I had mind there, conscious or not, came out of my own work on Matt Weiner and his involvement in the project. To me what Matt has done with his show MAD MEN (http://www.amctv.com/originals/madmen/) is to portray men at their absolute worst–drinking, womanizing, lying– and to use the 1960 period to build up a reflection of our own time so that we can see even in all that bad behavior, as co-editor James likes to say, there is something redeeming in these men’s humanity, in the unspoken cry for help, in the very misery Don Draper, the lead character, put himself through at his own hands. Weiner has told me over and over again he is not so much interested in what his characters say but what they don’t say (echoing what Neil Chethik keeps tell us, www.neilchethik.com). In this way MAD MEN becomes a cautionary tale for modern men to get off their ass and escape the prison of their own making.

So GOOD MEN, for me, is a direct reference to Weiner and his body of work. It says that we are not MAD in fact, we are good at heart if not at deed. We just have to say what is so fucking hard to say, in order to escape Don Draper’s prison. And this book is the start.

 

March 29, 2009

GOOD MAN: John Oliver

Filed under: Death, Good Men — tmatlack @ 7:00 am

From “Blindfolded”

Kate was 18 months old and never before had been sick. She had a runny nose for a few days but no other symptoms. Then one evening she developed a high fever. As a precaution we took her to Womack Army Hospital at Fort Bragg that night. The waiting room was filled with dozens of soldiers who had been injured during the athletic competitions held as part of All-American Week, an annual tradition for the 82nd.

After a long wait Kate saw a doctor who examined her and concluded that she likely had a virus. He told us to take her home and return if her fever didn’t ease the next day. A few hours after we got home, in the middle of the night, Kate went into shock. I drove frantically back to the hospital while Melissa gave Kate CPR.

There’s a special room in every hospital where people wait for doctors to come and tell them the news that someone they love has just died. It’s an awful place. You enter as one person, filled with naïve hope, prayers and fear, and you exit as someone else, someone with nothing, only the sickening awareness that you’re alive and wondering what to do with yourself because someone you’ve never met before just told you the focus of your life is gone.

I called the battalion headquarters and let them know I would be absent from the parade formation that would take place in four hours. After that, my wife and I went to the bathroom, and then we walked out of the ER and toward our car; its headlights were still on, and its doors were still open. We went home and slept for a little while.

In the morning some of my fellow officers came by the house. Their wives brought food, but we didn’t eat. Nobody stayed more than a few minutes. The house was cluttered with Kate’s toys and clothes. A soiled diaper was sitting next to her crib in her room.

My friend Kevin came by that morning. He walked in the door and gave me the greatest hug a man has ever given me. It was the hug of a man comforting a child and asking nothing in return. It was firm and warm and complete, like a massive blanket being wrapped around me. He didn’t speak, but his gesture told me, “I’m sorry that the world is so harsh, but I will help you.”

 

March 28, 2009

GOOD MAN: Amin Ahmad

Filed under: Good Men, Relationships — tmatlack @ 7:00 am

From “Structural Failure”

It is getting very cold. I spend every day in the South End with Peter, surveying apartments. Peter and I have become like an old married couple, communicating in gestures, finishing each other’s sentences.

We go into the top-floor apartment of a brownstone that is settling, jagged cracks in the foundation, the stairs leaning drunkenly. This whole area of the South End is landfill, the houses built on centuries of garbage.

“This baby’s funky,” Peter says, “It’s a six, for sure.”

“Yup,” I say, knowing he means a total gut: new ceilings, new floors, new sheetrock on the walls. But from the slant of the floors, I’m also thinking: structural failure. I stand in the darkened apartment, trying to imagine how we’re going to fix this leaning, exhausted building. It takes me a few minutes to realize that Peter is standing stock still in the middle of the room. His nose is quivering like a hunting dog’s.

“Something’s wrong,” Peter says, gesturing to the kitchen stove. All the knobs are missing.

“What? We’re going to need a new stove?”

“Shhh. Listen.”

In the growing silence there is only the gurgle of heating pipes, the scratch-scratch of pigeons on the window sill. Then I hear it- a faint, high-pitched keening sound.

Peter flings open the door of the living room closet. Inside, cowering in a dark corner are two little boys. The older one – he’s maybe five– is clamping his hand over the crying three year-olds’ mouth. They are both filthy, with snotty, crusted noses.

Peter kneels down in front of them.

“It’s okay, it’s okay. We’re not going to hurt you. Where’s you’re mommy? At work?”

The older boy glares up, but the baby– he’s just a baby, the same age as my son—nods his head, still crying. Peter slowly takes the little boy into his arms, fishes out a handkerchief, and wipes the boy’s face.

“Call social services,” Peter says. He reels off a number and I dial it on my cell phone. A woman at the other end says someone will be there in half an hour.

We sit down on a battered couch in the living room with the kids, the baby in my lap, the five year old in Peter’s. Both the children fall asleep, exhausted from crying. It feels so familiar to have a warm child in my arms, sleeping peacefully.

I remember the first morning in the hospital after my son was born. Holding him in my arms, I’d looked out at the city, and whispered to him, “Baby, I’m your father, and I will always take care of you.”

And I have. I pick him up from daycare every day, take him home and bathe him, dance with him in my arms until he falls asleep. When my wife returns from work she scoops him up in her arms and croons, “Oh, my baby, my poor baby, never mind, your mother is home.” Then she takes the baby into the other room.

Later at night my wife and I argue: about my low paying job, about the money we do not have to buy a house. Ignoring our finances, my wife plans a trip to India. She wants to get off the plane like a movie star, with suitcases full of presents for her relatives. She retreats into her three-hour long Hindi movies and when I touch her, she snarls at me. I have become the symbol of her unhappiness.

I sit on the battered couch, the little boy asleep in my arms. His face is pushed into my chest, soaking it with drool. When the social services woman arrives, the boy wakes with a start and looks up at me with big, frightened eyes. I feel as though I’m handing over my own son.

The woman departs, the children crying all the way down the stairs. Peter’s face is ashen.

“I knew it, from the stove,” he says softly. “When they leave the kids alone they take the knobs off.”

Where the little boy slept in my arms, there is only air.

“What is happening to this world?” Peter continues. “These little babies left alone. And you can’t blame the woman. Her husband’s gone, left her alone. She’s got to get a job, feed those hungry mouths.

I am still sitting on the couch. My eyes are closed tight, my breath coming in ragged gasps.

“Hey, you okay, man?” Peter walks over, touches my shoulder. “These things happen. You gotta let it go.”

When I open my eyes, they are filled with tears.

“Let’s go get us some hot coffee,” Peter says. “That’s what we need.”

We take our usual seats by the plate glass window of the coffee shop. My hands are shaking so badly that I scald myself.

“What’s going on, man?” Peter looks at me over the rim of his coffee cup.

“Peter, it’s bad. We’re fighting all the time. She says she’ll kill herself.”

“Your wife? She serious?”

“I don’t know. It’s killing me.”

“You talk to her? You try- whatchamacallit- counseling?”

I nod dumbly. We’ve tried an Indian woman therapist who told us smugly that Indians don’t get divorced, that we’ll just have to learn to live with each other.

“My wife’s like a kid. I can’t trust her alone with my son.”

“Slow down, man. Drink your coffee. Breathe.”

The coffee is burnt and hot. I feel its sourness coiling in my stomach.

“I want to leave my marriage. I can’t handle it any more.”

I’ve never said these words to anyone before. I would never dare say this to my family, or to my Indian friends. Nobody in our family has ever been divorced. Indians don’t get divorced. Divorce is failure. Divorce is the destruction of the home. Divorce is to become like the Americans, who are barbarians and abandon their families.

Peter’s eyes widen.

“You sure you want to leave your wife?”

“I know it’s completely wrong. I know it’s a horrible thing to do and….”

“Listen to me.”

I look up at Peter, at his calm eyes. He speaks slowly, choosing his words.

“Listen. You a good man. I know that. You love your son. But. You got to look after yourself first. Understand? If you’re no good, there’s nothing you can do for him. You hear me?”

I nod again. I have heard him, the first words that I’ve heard in a long time.

“I’ll finish the other two apartments. You finish your coffee. Then take a walk, clear your head, man. No arguments.”

I watch Peter leave, a small man in his olive-drab janitor’s uniform, hunched against the cold. He looks tiny and alien on that cold Boston street.

 

March 27, 2009

Daily Man: Trash Talkin’

Filed under: Childhood, Daily Man — tmatlack @ 6:00 am

At the playground with my four year old son yesterday I got to thinking about male bonding. At the recreation center on Key Biscayne I didn’t have to look very far for answers. At 7 AM on a Thursday morning the adjacent field was filled with 40 and 50 year old men playing a very serious game of soccer. KB is 60% Spanish speaking with a heavy dose of Argentinean transplants. Soccer is a religion.

Off to the side I saw a middle age man running back and forth between two teammates in a drill that looked like it might kill him. One of the men would flip the ball up in the air and the torturee would run at it, sky into the air (such as a 50 year old can) snap a header and land just in time for the other torturer to flip another ball in the air 10 yards away. The torturee would run at that ball, jump and head it. By which time the first ball was back in the air. On and on he went, back and forth until finally there was a whistle on the field. The old man trotted onto the pitch, now fully prepared for battle, the skins’ secret weapon against the shirts’ side.

What is that? I couldn’t understand a word of the Spanish being shouted on the field, yet I knew exactly what was being communicated.

My friend Neil told me recently there is some non verbal manhood thing that happens around sport. In a pick-up basketball game, if you get put on a team with strangers and a fight breaks out, what do you do? Protect your new best friends with your fists and a lot of trash talking chest beating, that’s what, even if you have never said anything to the guys on your squad beyond, “Hey, I’m open!”

As I pushed my boy on the swing, I thought about all this and realized that male bonding isn’t really something you can talk about. It just is. On the court or the soccer field, that’s where we feel most comfortable. And that’s the way it should be. Call me a caveman. I can’t even hear you. I’m looking for the next ball in the air.

 

March 26, 2009

Daily Man: Bedtime Reading

Filed under: Daily Man, James Houghton — tmatlack @ 6:01 am
My friend Hal Movius (a psychologist, negotiations expert, author of a soon-to-be-published book on negotiating strategy, and one of my favorite polymaths) has suggested that we ought to find a sociological framework for this book. He argues that a book of stories about guys – as interesting as they may be – will have to compete with stories that are printed daily on-line, in magazines, and newspapers. To really make an impact with this book, Hal argues, we need to find a theme (or several) that can be captured in a catchy two word phrase (“The Man Muddle”, “Men on the Wire”?), and then let the various personal stories embody the theme(s). We might be wrong, he argues, but at least we would be taking a stand and offering the public something more compelling than a sampling of men’s lives in middle age.

To help prod my thinking, Hal offered the work of Dr. Roy Baumeister (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Baumeister), currently the Eppes Eminent Professor of Psychology and head of the social psychology graduate program at Florida State University, as an example of truly interesting work being done on the issue of manhood and male self-esteem. After a little checking I found a paper that Dr. Baumeister had given at a conference of the American Psychological Association in 2007 entitled (how aptly) “Is There Anything Good About Men?” Hal did not steer me wrong. It is a fascinating overview of how men have developed different cultural traits from women, largely thanks to the genetic fact that today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men; ie 80% of women but only 40% of men have reproduced over the ages. We are just not as relevant as women and therefore need to compensate in different ways.

I will not spoil the answer to the question posed by the title of the paper – and would encourage you to read if for yourself at http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~baumeistertice/goodaboutmen.htm - but I was particularly interested in the following passage in which Dr. Baumeister seems to touch on some of the driving forces behind the male pathos we have been trying to uncover through the stories we have collected so far.

Earning Manhood

The phrase “Be a man” is not as common as it once was, but there is still some sense that manhood must be earned. Every adult female is a woman and is entitled to respect as such, but many cultures withhold respect from the males until and unless the lads prove themselves. This is of course tremendously useful for the culture, because it can set the terms by which males earn respect as men, and in that way it can motivate the men to do things that the culture finds productive.

Some sociological writings about the male role have emphasized that to be a man, you have to produce more than you consume. That is, men are expected, first, to provide for themselves: If somebody else provides for you, you’re less than a man. Second, the man should create some additional wealth or surplus value so that it can provide for others in addition to himself. These can be his wife and children, or others who depend on him, or his subordinates, or even perhaps just paying taxes that the government can use. Regardless, you’re not a man unless you produce at that level.

Again, I’m not saying men have it worse than women. There are plenty of problems and disadvantages that cultures put on women. My point is just that cultures find men useful in these very specific ways. Requiring the man to earn respect by producing wealth and value that can support himself and others is one of these. Women do not face this particular challenge or requirement.

These demands also contribute to various male behavior patterns. The ambition, competition, and striving for greatness may well be linked to this requirement to fight for respect. All-male groups tend to be marked by putdowns and other practices that remind everybody that there is NOT enough respect to go around, because this awareness motivates each man to try harder to earn respect. This, incidentally, has probably been a major source of friction as women have moved into the workplace, and organizations have had to shift toward policies that everyone is entitled to respect. The men hadn’t originally built them to respect everybody.

One of the basic, most widely accepted gender differences is agency versus communion. Male agency may be partly an adaptation to this kind of social life based on larger groups, where people aren’t necessarily valued and one has to strive for respect. To succeed in the male social sphere of large groups, you need an active, agentic self to fight for your place, because it isn’t given to you and only a few will be successful. Even the male ego, with its concern with proving oneself and competing against others, seems likely to be designed to cope with systems where there is a shortage of respect and you have to work hard to get some — or else you’ll be exposed to humiliation.

We could not, and certainly have not, said it better ourselves. One of the original (untested and anecdotal) premises of this book was that guys our age (40-60) have been caught between the expectations of our father’s generation to be strong, successful providers and the emerging cultural imperatives and expectations that men should be nurturing, equal partners. For my money Dr. Baumeister hits the nail on the head…we have to fight hard to be successful or we risk being exposed to humiliation. And that is not a useful excuse for going out with the guys when it is your turn to wash dishes.

But as much as I respect my friend Hal and the framework presented by Dr. Baumeister (which is rooted in evolutionary theory, social psychology and demographic data) Tom and I are not psychologists or sociobiologists; we did not set out to reduce the stories to fit a theory. We are just two guys who have been through a few ups and downs, who have reflected a bit on our own responses and choices in reaction to the balancing act described above, and who do not have to think very hard about lots of other middle age guys who have dealt with other ups and downs. What was interesting to us from the start was the power of the shared humanity in the simple stories of guys dealing with death or addictions or divorce or social and familial expectations. Our hope and belief was that as long as they told a compelling story they would attract readers who might be able to recognize themselves in some way, or who might think about their own situations just a little differently.

And so the debate rages on. Hal is not the only one who has encouraged us to take a more expository approach, grounded in sociobiological research; and there are many people who have expressed concern that the title is not catchy enough or that we do not have enough of a hook to attract a broad readership. Any thoughts or opinions on that front would be welcome, of course.
(email me at: james@coburnhoughton.com).

Before you vote I leave you with a final offering from Dr. Baumeister, this time from his own blog at http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/cultural-animal/200806/one-ideal-image-manliness. In “One Ideal Image Of Manliness” he sings the praises of Paul Rusesabagina, the real life hotel manager played by Don Cheadle in the movie “Hotel Rwanda” who risked his own life to save so many during the Rwandan genocide. As he describes this quiet hero Dr. Baumeister says, he “offers a great model of manliness. Slight of build, gentle, with soft high voice and almost servile manner, he bears no resemblance to the Schwarzenegger type of manhood. Yet the inner strength and resourcefulness that he exhibits throughout the story were remarkable.” He concludes his blog:

If you have a son, you might show him this film as a positive example of manhood. Over the years, if he watches films and television he will see plenty of exemplars of the violent, musclebound, arrogant type, but these are not helpful models toward which our young men should aspire. He will also see plenty of male film characters doing wicked, irresponsible things, and the effects of these on our youngsters are not likely to be positive. Seeing a quiet, gentle man thrown into a desperate situation and taking heroic responsibility to care for others might just inspire some of our boys to become better men.

Same author, same underlying thesis – just different language and a different story to get at the same question of what makes a good man, or a man good. So the only question I have is which would you rather curl up with at night? A socio-behavioural analysis of the origins of male culture? Or the story of a good man trying to do the right thing despite long odds?

JAMES HOUGHTON

 

Older Posts »